Bruce Feiler the best selling author of a series of wonderful non religious books about religion such as Abraham and Walking the Bible has a provocative post in his blog today entitled Muslim Blood in the White House? In this post Bruce, an expert in religious relations describes Obama´s complex family background and wonders if somebody who was partly raised as a Muslim can be elected president in a country that is at war with Muslims. Moreover the subject becomes more complicated by Obama´s own description of his upbringing which was a complicated mix of Islam, Atheism and Christianity.

Obama — whose father, stepfather, brother and grandfather were Muslims — explained his own first name, Barack, in “Dreams”: “It means ‘Blessed.’ In Arabic. My grandfather was a Muslim.” In his second memoir, “The Audacity of Hope,” Obama added: “Although my father had been raised a Muslim, by the time he met my mother he was a confirmed atheist.”

Being an agnostic Jew myself (would not call myself an atheist Jew cause atheist has that militant anti god component that I don´t endorse) and knowing how strongly most Americans feel about religion I cannot think of a least popular combination for a Presidential candidate than having a Muslim/Atheist background. I think this issue is likely to be raised again and again in the election, especially by whoever his Republican opponent is should Obama make it to the Presidential race. Unfortunately most American´s are quite xenophobic, if Kerry got hit for liking the French, what will happen to Obama Hussein Barack? Frankly I think this is sad because I think that Obama´s unique cultural heritage will make him more sensitive to racial and human relations.

Follow Martin Varsavsky on Twitter: twitter.com/martinvars

No Comments

Steve Ross on January 29, 2007  · 

I saw an interview with Obama and he said he was a Christian. It always surprises me when people “switch” religions. He went from a guy who believed in a flying horse to guy who believes in a man that can walk on water.

I’d like to elect someone who believes in science and peace?

3.0 rating

Patrick on February 1, 2007  · 

Well there is no doubt he could be someone that thinks outside of the US political box.

Looking back on US history, they used to simply assasinate presidential candidates that represented minorities – think MLK and B Kennedy(just like in the wild wild west).

The demographinc make up has changed a lot and if not this time, it will be more chances that the US will end up with a candidate closer representing the masses in the US. He will also very likely be a democrate as the Rep are really there for the money and oil industry. This used to be the way with conservatives in the UK but Blair made a success in changing UK socialist values.

The main US religion is still money under the cover of protestant and bigotry values. This is why they are very successful inovators… and amazingly ignorant of the rest of the world.

3.0 rating

Leave a Comment

Español / English


Subscribe to e-mail bulletin:
Recent Tweets