Published by MartinVarsavsky.net in General with No Comments
Here´s another announcement.
Follow Martin Varsavsky on Twitter: twitter.com/martinvars
Euronerd on July 19, 2007 · Log in to Reply
One essential difference with the FON Ads model, is that the hotspots are provided by companies, not by private persons (yes, private, unless a Bill is in FON’s view a franchise. In which case FON could spend some effort to make that clear to the Foneros).
An other difference may be the interactive nature of the Ads, that guarantees the ad is viewed and, on a certain level, understood. More attractive for business, but the client also must have a better incentive (hours of Internet) to accept this.
So, the model is slightly different. Any plans to adapt to this?
skynet on July 19, 2007 · Log in to Reply
http://www.free-hotspot.com invented WifiAds years ago… it does not use Broadband from particulars nor is it interested in providing wifi on non-public places
Martin Vives on July 19, 2007 · Log in to Reply
I guess that in the ever-evolving globalized world of tech companies, the most important is not who has the idea first, but who is able to get more out of it.
Martin Varsavsky on July 23, 2007 · Log in to Reply
Fon is extremely happy with the results of the WiFi ads campaign so far, but the truth is that we are happy because these ads are making us grow the Fon movement. To be fair we have no experience yet advertising for others.
skynet on July 23, 2007 · Log in to Reply
Why not ask from your sponsor Google who invented Adwords?
Perhaps they should use eg their Youtube acquisition to broadcast on all your Fon hotspots?
or use your Joost investment? perhaps some Bill hotspots have a wireless computer terminal as well?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Please wait, retrieving tweets...
2012 © Martin Varsavsky | English. Powered by WordPress. Theme by Serifly.