<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Is Bombing Acceptable And Placing Bombs Isn´t?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/why-is-bombing-acceptable-and-placing-bombs-isnat.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/why-is-bombing-acceptable-and-placing-bombs-isnat.html</link>
	<description>Blog of an entrepreneur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:31:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/why-is-bombing-acceptable-and-placing-bombs-isnat.html#comment-2133</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=609#comment-2133</guid>
		<description>I think the US is currently suffering the most hypocrytical leadership that has ever been elected.

They denounce terrorism, while themselves being implicated in it:

Prior to the Iran/Hesbollah &#039;incident&#039; there was a terror campaign in Iran involving street bombing that killed many including several Iran cabinet members, Iran initially pointed the finger at the British SAS, but later indicated they had evidence to show it was US special forces. The US later indicated that it had been running &#039;preliminary operations&#039; in Iran, what a euphemism for what they denounce as unacceptable terrorism when someone else does it. - funnily enough this wasn&#039;t explored to any depth by the western press (and I&#039;m sure wasn&#039;t even mentioned on Fox).

Sane goes with Iraq. Saddam Hussein got stubborn and lay down the gauntlet re: weapons inspections because the US had been pestering away with continual air strikes long before any UN resolutions had even been sought. If the US hadn&#039;t been manipulating him like this the weapons inspections would have probably continued without incident and proven there were no WMD without the need to kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqi and American people.

I have trouble understanding why people don&#039;t understand suicide bombers. When you have young men in these countries who have lost everything to the US: What have they got to lose?

I&#039;m so glad I don&#039;t live in the US right now, and I&#039;m not that happy about being in the UK. I only hope people will come round to realising that a leader who gets themselves elected by playing on peoples fears is a bully and very dangerous to have at the helm.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the US is currently suffering the most hypocrytical leadership that has ever been elected.</p>
<p>They denounce terrorism, while themselves being implicated in it:</p>
<p>Prior to the Iran/Hesbollah &#8216;incident&#8217; there was a terror campaign in Iran involving street bombing that killed many including several Iran cabinet members, Iran initially pointed the finger at the British SAS, but later indicated they had evidence to show it was US special forces. The US later indicated that it had been running &#8216;preliminary operations&#8217; in Iran, what a euphemism for what they denounce as unacceptable terrorism when someone else does it. &#8211; funnily enough this wasn&#8217;t explored to any depth by the western press (and I&#8217;m sure wasn&#8217;t even mentioned on Fox).</p>
<p>Sane goes with Iraq. Saddam Hussein got stubborn and lay down the gauntlet re: weapons inspections because the US had been pestering away with continual air strikes long before any UN resolutions had even been sought. If the US hadn&#8217;t been manipulating him like this the weapons inspections would have probably continued without incident and proven there were no WMD without the need to kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqi and American people.</p>
<p>I have trouble understanding why people don&#8217;t understand suicide bombers. When you have young men in these countries who have lost everything to the US: What have they got to lose?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m so glad I don&#8217;t live in the US right now, and I&#8217;m not that happy about being in the UK. I only hope people will come round to realising that a leader who gets themselves elected by playing on peoples fears is a bully and very dangerous to have at the helm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: killy-the-frog</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/why-is-bombing-acceptable-and-placing-bombs-isnat.html#comment-2132</link>
		<dc:creator>killy-the-frog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=609#comment-2132</guid>
		<description>Should Spain go bomb the white house to limit the spread of terrorism ?

;-)

by the way, previous Spanish government start with the USA the war in Iraq against the will of the population.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should Spain go bomb the white house to limit the spread of terrorism ?<br />
 <img src='http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>by the way, previous Spanish government start with the USA the war in Iraq against the will of the population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques Mattheij</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/why-is-bombing-acceptable-and-placing-bombs-isnat.html#comment-2131</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques Mattheij</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=609#comment-2131</guid>
		<description>The &#039;war on terror&#039; is a figment of someones overpowerful imagination. There is no such thing. 

There are individuals that have broken the law. Some of them are now dead, some are at large (but it seems we&#039;re not trying very hard to find them). This is a police issue, not an army issue, but it&#039;s hard to give out billions of dollars of &#039;pie&#039; on a police action, much easier when it&#039;s the army. Hence the war on terror and the war on drugs and so on. 

If 1/2 the money spent on the so called war on terror would be spent on helping the developing world the war on terror would be over and 1/2 the money would be saved. I don&#039;t think that&#039;s going to happen any time soon though.

Some people just like guns and money...

excellent blog, I was pointed here by &#039;bob s.&#039; 

I expected just technology, but am happy to find these other thoughts as well.

best regards,

  Jacques Mattheij</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;war on terror&#8217; is a figment of someones overpowerful imagination. There is no such thing. </p>
<p>There are individuals that have broken the law. Some of them are now dead, some are at large (but it seems we&#8217;re not trying very hard to find them). This is a police issue, not an army issue, but it&#8217;s hard to give out billions of dollars of &#8216;pie&#8217; on a police action, much easier when it&#8217;s the army. Hence the war on terror and the war on drugs and so on. </p>
<p>If 1/2 the money spent on the so called war on terror would be spent on helping the developing world the war on terror would be over and 1/2 the money would be saved. I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s going to happen any time soon though.</p>
<p>Some people just like guns and money&#8230;</p>
<p>excellent blog, I was pointed here by &#8216;bob s.&#8217; </p>
<p>I expected just technology, but am happy to find these other thoughts as well.</p>
<p>best regards,</p>
<p>  Jacques Mattheij</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/why-is-bombing-acceptable-and-placing-bombs-isnat.html#comment-2130</link>
		<dc:creator>Someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=609#comment-2130</guid>
		<description>They do not vote, and Pakistan is not a threat now ..... they do not want to wipe Israel out.

Martin, your policy with terrorism is to negotiate or let it be ..... and they get stronger anyway.
That is what happened since Israel left Lebanon in 2000 .... they got stronger, just waiting for the right moment to strike.
You acuse the USA and Israel for the grow of terrorism ...????!!!?!!?!

The terrorism issue is pretty new in the world, and I think that there is no effective weapon against it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do not vote, and Pakistan is not a threat now &#8230;.. they do not want to wipe Israel out.</p>
<p>Martin, your policy with terrorism is to negotiate or let it be &#8230;.. and they get stronger anyway.<br />
That is what happened since Israel left Lebanon in 2000 &#8230;. they got stronger, just waiting for the right moment to strike.<br />
You acuse the USA and Israel for the grow of terrorism &#8230;????!!!?!!?!</p>
<p>The terrorism issue is pretty new in the world, and I think that there is no effective weapon against it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Varsavsky</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/why-is-bombing-acceptable-and-placing-bombs-isnat.html#comment-2129</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Varsavsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=609#comment-2129</guid>
		<description>Ariel, 

I am pretty sure that  USA and Israel´s antiterrorism policies push Muslim moderates in the hands of extremists and result in groups like Al Qaeda, Hamas and Hezbollah who when Bush got to power were much less powerful than today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ariel, </p>
<p>I am pretty sure that  USA and Israel´s antiterrorism policies push Muslim moderates in the hands of extremists and result in groups like Al Qaeda, Hamas and Hezbollah who when Bush got to power were much less powerful than today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Varsavsky</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/why-is-bombing-acceptable-and-placing-bombs-isnat.html#comment-2128</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Varsavsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=609#comment-2128</guid>
		<description>Gunjam,

You seem to believe that if you are a neighbor of a terrorist and you die so be it, you were in the wrong neighborhood.  I don´t.  But the second issue that you don´t address is how poorly the USA and Israel are doing in the sense that terrorists organizations like Hamas, Hezbollah and Al Qaeda are more popular than ever among Muslims and are finding easier and easier to recruit members.  Terrorism is based on probability of causing harm, more operatives means higher probability.  Even if we don´t share the ethics of my comment I wonder if you truly believe that torture, ilegitimate detentions, air bombings have actually made Israel, Europe and USA safer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gunjam,</p>
<p>You seem to believe that if you are a neighbor of a terrorist and you die so be it, you were in the wrong neighborhood.  I don´t.  But the second issue that you don´t address is how poorly the USA and Israel are doing in the sense that terrorists organizations like Hamas, Hezbollah and Al Qaeda are more popular than ever among Muslims and are finding easier and easier to recruit members.  Terrorism is based on probability of causing harm, more operatives means higher probability.  Even if we don´t share the ethics of my comment I wonder if you truly believe that torture, ilegitimate detentions, air bombings have actually made Israel, Europe and USA safer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Varsavsky</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/why-is-bombing-acceptable-and-placing-bombs-isnat.html#comment-2127</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Varsavsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=609#comment-2127</guid>
		<description>Someone, 

I already spoke many times against Iran. I share your view that Ahmadinejad is a tremendous threat.  But again I don´t see why it is OK to have a nuclear Pakistan whose population according to the Pew Institute Poll would elect Osama Bin Laden as president if they could vote and not Iran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone, </p>
<p>I already spoke many times against Iran. I share your view that Ahmadinejad is a tremendous threat.  But again I don´t see why it is OK to have a nuclear Pakistan whose population according to the Pew Institute Poll would elect Osama Bin Laden as president if they could vote and not Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/why-is-bombing-acceptable-and-placing-bombs-isnat.html#comment-2126</link>
		<dc:creator>Someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=609#comment-2126</guid>
		<description>Millions of people die because of deseases and hunger, and you care about those islamic terrorists?
Yes, we all have human ethics, but this world is as is, there are wars and people die, good and innocent people die, but terrorists must be destroyed and smashed.

Be sure that if Iran goes ahead with their nuclear project, no country will do anything, besides Israel, of course.
Israel will finally attack Iran, with maybe some casualties, and the world will blame them Israel, as usual, .... for saving the world.

If you don&#039;t want this to happen, do something !!! Speak against Iran please.

I dislike Bush and Bush&#039;s politics too, but if you criticize the USA and Israel all the time, you get along with terrorism.
Think again Martin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Millions of people die because of deseases and hunger, and you care about those islamic terrorists?<br />
Yes, we all have human ethics, but this world is as is, there are wars and people die, good and innocent people die, but terrorists must be destroyed and smashed.</p>
<p>Be sure that if Iran goes ahead with their nuclear project, no country will do anything, besides Israel, of course.<br />
Israel will finally attack Iran, with maybe some casualties, and the world will blame them Israel, as usual, &#8230;. for saving the world.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t want this to happen, do something !!! Speak against Iran please.</p>
<p>I dislike Bush and Bush&#8217;s politics too, but if you criticize the USA and Israel all the time, you get along with terrorism.<br />
Think again Martin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hasan</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/why-is-bombing-acceptable-and-placing-bombs-isnat.html#comment-2125</link>
		<dc:creator>Hasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=609#comment-2125</guid>
		<description>Jared Diamond wrote in Collapse (summarising as I don&#039;t have the book in front of me) that a world power, once it has exhausted resources and destroyed its environment beyond repair, becomes militaristic and then fails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jared Diamond wrote in Collapse (summarising as I don&#8217;t have the book in front of me) that a world power, once it has exhausted resources and destroyed its environment beyond repair, becomes militaristic and then fails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gunjam</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/why-is-bombing-acceptable-and-placing-bombs-isnat.html#comment-2124</link>
		<dc:creator>gunjam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=609#comment-2124</guid>
		<description>This war. Al-Qa&#039;eda has declared war on the US (and they also threatened to invade Ethiopia) and we simply took them at their word.  What is there not to get about it? Further, can you not distinguish between TARGETING terrorists (and sometimes killing some civilians in the process -- as has happened in MOST wars) and deliberately TARGETING civilians?  Please, if you are unable to make such rather elementary distinctions, you are advised to stck to your entrepreneurial posts, which make a lot more sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This war. Al-Qa&#8217;eda has declared war on the US (and they also threatened to invade Ethiopia) and we simply took them at their word.  What is there not to get about it? Further, can you not distinguish between TARGETING terrorists (and sometimes killing some civilians in the process &#8212; as has happened in MOST wars) and deliberately TARGETING civilians?  Please, if you are unable to make such rather elementary distinctions, you are advised to stck to your entrepreneurial posts, which make a lot more sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

