<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Traditional Media vs Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/traditional-media-vs-internet.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/traditional-media-vs-internet.html</link>
	<description>Blog of an entrepreneur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:31:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lena Michel</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/traditional-media-vs-internet.html#comment-32228</link>
		<dc:creator>Lena Michel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/traditional-media-vs-internet.html#comment-32228</guid>
		<description>The Spanish media is scary. The amount of inaccuracies that permeate the coverage is astonishing for a supposedly &quot;professional&quot; business. They need to stop hiring becarios and get some real, seasoned reporters in their ranks who know how to actually report a story from top to bottom. And yeah, all that deadwood sitting at the top needs to go too. Make way for a younger generation who has real journalism experience, in Spain and abroad. 

 What makes it worse is how incredibly lazy Spanish media are. They take things off the newswires or rip stories out of the NYTimes, Washington Post and just translate them into Spanish, while constantly putting their own peculiar, and I do mean peculiar, anti-American, anti-globalization, slant on it.  It&#039;s obvious that many of the oligarchs running Spanish media have NO CLUE about what&#039;s going outside their despachos. ¡¡Espabilad!!

What traditional media doesn&#039;t understand about digital media is that people want their news when they want it. They don&#039;t want to wait until the evening to hear some pretty (or not so pretty) talking head telling them the &quot;news of the day.&quot;  Also, bloggers put news into context. Punto. People are hungry not only for news but also analysis, for context...&quot;What does this mean? How will this affect me?&quot;, etc. The best bloggers give information while putting it into context by either giving it a reality check, questioning the veracity of it, etc. 

The traditional media has a built in competitive advantage over bloggers (thanks to their deep pockets, extensive media networks, huge staffs, access to information from valuable sources, etc.). But like Cinderella&#039;s ugly stepsisters, they&#039;re too focused on denigrating and trying to cut down the little guy to stop and realize that there is a tremendous opportunity right now for ALL who want to reshape the landscape. Oh well. Their loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Spanish media is scary. The amount of inaccuracies that permeate the coverage is astonishing for a supposedly &#8220;professional&#8221; business. They need to stop hiring becarios and get some real, seasoned reporters in their ranks who know how to actually report a story from top to bottom. And yeah, all that deadwood sitting at the top needs to go too. Make way for a younger generation who has real journalism experience, in Spain and abroad. </p>
<p> What makes it worse is how incredibly lazy Spanish media are. They take things off the newswires or rip stories out of the NYTimes, Washington Post and just translate them into Spanish, while constantly putting their own peculiar, and I do mean peculiar, anti-American, anti-globalization, slant on it.  It&#8217;s obvious that many of the oligarchs running Spanish media have NO CLUE about what&#8217;s going outside their despachos. ¡¡Espabilad!!</p>
<p>What traditional media doesn&#8217;t understand about digital media is that people want their news when they want it. They don&#8217;t want to wait until the evening to hear some pretty (or not so pretty) talking head telling them the &#8220;news of the day.&#8221;  Also, bloggers put news into context. Punto. People are hungry not only for news but also analysis, for context&#8230;&#8221;What does this mean? How will this affect me?&#8221;, etc. The best bloggers give information while putting it into context by either giving it a reality check, questioning the veracity of it, etc. </p>
<p>The traditional media has a built in competitive advantage over bloggers (thanks to their deep pockets, extensive media networks, huge staffs, access to information from valuable sources, etc.). But like Cinderella&#8217;s ugly stepsisters, they&#8217;re too focused on denigrating and trying to cut down the little guy to stop and realize that there is a tremendous opportunity right now for ALL who want to reshape the landscape. Oh well. Their loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Web, un chaos amateur constructif ? &#187; Adverbe.com - Ecrire pour le Web, formation, travail en réseau à distance, conseil éditorial, rédaction</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/traditional-media-vs-internet.html#comment-31103</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Web, un chaos amateur constructif ? &#187; Adverbe.com - Ecrire pour le Web, formation, travail en réseau à distance, conseil éditorial, rédaction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/traditional-media-vs-internet.html#comment-31103</guid>
		<description>[...] supériorité des nouveaux médias est simplement expliquée par Martin Varsavsky, le créateur de FON : &#8220;L&#8217;Internet est plus crédible que les médias traditionnels non [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] supériorité des nouveaux médias est simplement expliquée par Martin Varsavsky, le créateur de FON : &#8220;L&#8217;Internet est plus crédible que les médias traditionnels non [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media tradizionali ed Internet : Aghenor</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/traditional-media-vs-internet.html#comment-30758</link>
		<dc:creator>Media tradizionali ed Internet : Aghenor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/traditional-media-vs-internet.html#comment-30758</guid>
		<description>[...] Martin Varsavsky [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Martin Varsavsky [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andres</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/traditional-media-vs-internet.html#comment-28669</link>
		<dc:creator>andres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/traditional-media-vs-internet.html#comment-28669</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s just a matter of ignorance.

Journalists in Spain dont know anything about media or the digital scene (they know about gossip and football gossip). If you are an ignorant you can only talk about stupid stuff like spam, fraud, addiction to text messages or chat rooms.

I&#039;d like to see what can the author of that Antena3 show about the impact of the internet in the Spanish society. I think 2 minutes will be enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s just a matter of ignorance.</p>
<p>Journalists in Spain dont know anything about media or the digital scene (they know about gossip and football gossip). If you are an ignorant you can only talk about stupid stuff like spam, fraud, addiction to text messages or chat rooms.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see what can the author of that Antena3 show about the impact of the internet in the Spanish society. I think 2 minutes will be enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilles Amsallem</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/traditional-media-vs-internet.html#comment-28541</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilles Amsallem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/traditional-media-vs-internet.html#comment-28541</guid>
		<description>Martin, I think you address too straightforwardly the problem of representative democracy vs. so participatory democracy. 
The trust in institutions ( media , politics , teachers … ) generally is a very serious issue that maybe your foundation  should seriously address in light of all consequences; 
 We can’t ignore the danger of a politic , media  education totally driven by immediate public opinion judgement . 
Of course we should take care of growing public dissatisfaction with the current system and media.
 The popular demands for new direct forms of social and political involvement and decision-making have increased particularly with Internet. More and more people are joining interest groups and engaging in unconventional forms of actions … it is good of course of course , but  I can’t imagine a future of democracy without reliance on the institutions that may have to take decisions not immediately understandable by public opinion . Gilles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin, I think you address too straightforwardly the problem of representative democracy vs. so participatory democracy.<br />
The trust in institutions ( media , politics , teachers … ) generally is a very serious issue that maybe your foundation  should seriously address in light of all consequences;<br />
 We can’t ignore the danger of a politic , media  education totally driven by immediate public opinion judgement .<br />
Of course we should take care of growing public dissatisfaction with the current system and media.<br />
 The popular demands for new direct forms of social and political involvement and decision-making have increased particularly with Internet. More and more people are joining interest groups and engaging in unconventional forms of actions … it is good of course of course , but  I can’t imagine a future of democracy without reliance on the institutions that may have to take decisions not immediately understandable by public opinion . Gilles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilles Amsallem</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/traditional-media-vs-internet.html#comment-28517</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilles Amsallem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 04:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/traditional-media-vs-internet.html#comment-28517</guid>
		<description>Congratulation to WIKIO, still lot of progress need to be done to respond expectations of press and media addicted (like me) ... super idea and concept ... I love it... Gilles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulation to WIKIO, still lot of progress need to be done to respond expectations of press and media addicted (like me) &#8230; super idea and concept &#8230; I love it&#8230; Gilles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

