<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can The US Elect A Muslim/Atheist now Christian President?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/can-the-us-elect-a-muslimatheist-now-christian-president.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/can-the-us-elect-a-muslimatheist-now-christian-president.html</link>
	<description>Blog of an entrepreneur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:31:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/can-the-us-elect-a-muslimatheist-now-christian-president.html#comment-2277</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=644#comment-2277</guid>
		<description>Well there is no doubt he could be someone that thinks outside of the US political box. 

Looking back on US history, they used to simply assasinate presidential candidates that represented minorities - think MLK and B Kennedy(just like in the wild wild west).

The demographinc make up  has changed a lot and if not this time, it will be more chances that the US will end up with a candidate closer representing the masses in the US. He will also very likely be a democrate as the Rep are really there for the money and oil industry. This used to be the way with conservatives in the UK but Blair made a success in changing UK socialist values.

The main US religion is still money under the cover of protestant and bigotry values. This is why they are very successful inovators... and amazingly ignorant of the rest of the world.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well there is no doubt he could be someone that thinks outside of the US political box. </p>
<p>Looking back on US history, they used to simply assasinate presidential candidates that represented minorities &#8211; think MLK and B Kennedy(just like in the wild wild west).</p>
<p>The demographinc make up  has changed a lot and if not this time, it will be more chances that the US will end up with a candidate closer representing the masses in the US. He will also very likely be a democrate as the Rep are really there for the money and oil industry. This used to be the way with conservatives in the UK but Blair made a success in changing UK socialist values.</p>
<p>The main US religion is still money under the cover of protestant and bigotry values. This is why they are very successful inovators&#8230; and amazingly ignorant of the rest of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ross</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/general/can-the-us-elect-a-muslimatheist-now-christian-president.html#comment-2276</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=644#comment-2276</guid>
		<description>I saw an interview with Obama and he said he was a Christian. It always surprises me when people &quot;switch&quot; religions. He went from a guy who believed in a flying horse to guy who believes in a man that can walk on water. 

I&#039;d like to elect someone who believes in science and peace?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw an interview with Obama and he said he was a Christian. It always surprises me when people &#8220;switch&#8221; religions. He went from a guy who believed in a flying horse to guy who believes in a man that can walk on water. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to elect someone who believes in science and peace?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

