<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fonera N</title>
	<atom:link href="http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/fon/fonera-n.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/fon/fonera-n.html</link>
	<description>Blog of an entrepreneur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:44:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Varsavsky</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/fon/fonera-n.html#comment-247272</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Varsavsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 18:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=770#comment-247272</guid>
		<description>we are waiting for n chips to come down in price</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we are waiting for n chips to come down in price</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/fon/fonera-n.html#comment-245743</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=770#comment-245743</guid>
		<description>Whatever happened to the Fonera N?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever happened to the Fonera N?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/fon/fonera-n.html#comment-52625</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=770#comment-52625</guid>
		<description>Really?
I am quite confused now. On the spanish blog (http://spanish.martinvarsavsky.net/general/fonera-n.html) and in the video, it says that a Fonera with a Fontena can reach 200-300m; whereas the Fonera N can reach 1km (in the video: going past the highway)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really?<br />
I am quite confused now. On the spanish blog (<a href="http://spanish.martinvarsavsky.net/general/fonera-n.html" rel="nofollow">http://spanish.martinvarsavsky.net/general/fonera-n.html</a>) and in the video, it says that a Fonera with a Fontena can reach 200-300m; whereas the Fonera N can reach 1km (in the video: going past the highway)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Varsavsky</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/fon/fonera-n.html#comment-52039</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Varsavsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=770#comment-52039</guid>
		<description>A fonera with a fontenna will go further than a fonera N which in any case is now set to be launched in April</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fonera with a fontenna will go further than a fonera N which in any case is now set to be launched in April</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashton</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/fon/fonera-n.html#comment-50726</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 20:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=770#comment-50726</guid>
		<description>Hello. 
I am thinking about buying a Fonera+; then I come across this blog post. My question is: Should I wait until the new Fonera N to come out or just go for the current one.
I see the Fonera as a long-term investment (I don&#039;t have a wireless router yet) and would like to know if WiFi 802.11n will work properly with the current WiFi adpater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.<br />
I am thinking about buying a Fonera+; then I come across this blog post. My question is: Should I wait until the new Fonera N to come out or just go for the current one.<br />
I see the Fonera as a long-term investment (I don&#8217;t have a wireless router yet) and would like to know if WiFi 802.11n will work properly with the current WiFi adpater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/fon/fonera-n.html#comment-10588</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 02:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=770#comment-10588</guid>
		<description>The &quot;Fonera N&quot; video no longer works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Fonera N&#8221; video no longer works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nils</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/fon/fonera-n.html#comment-3222</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 13:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=770#comment-3222</guid>
		<description>try to connect my new SKYPE SMC  phone
But please help me 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>try to connect my new SKYPE SMC  phone<br />
But please help me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillem Alsina</title>
		<link>http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/fon/fonera-n.html#comment-3221</link>
		<dc:creator>Guillem Alsina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 18:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.2/en/?p=770#comment-3221</guid>
		<description>The speed conection is jumping (or maybe the correct word is climbing? I must improve my english :-P ) every day, but my question is: is not better to saty with a single standard two or more years and improve in laboratories the other standards to make only a giant step when people change his routers/access points? I think (and I know) lots of people are saying that technology is going too fast for them, and they are obliged to buy another device one or two years after the one they have because this one is obsolete, and they say &quot;only one year!!!&quot;.

I think we must search a good balance between two factors: technical advance and people economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The speed conection is jumping (or maybe the correct word is climbing? I must improve my english <img src='http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' />  ) every day, but my question is: is not better to saty with a single standard two or more years and improve in laboratories the other standards to make only a giant step when people change his routers/access points? I think (and I know) lots of people are saying that technology is going too fast for them, and they are obliged to buy another device one or two years after the one they have because this one is obsolete, and they say &#8220;only one year!!!&#8221;.</p>
<p>I think we must search a good balance between two factors: technical advance and people economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

